Literature Bulletin. Administrative Law publications, no. 3 (December, 2015)

Behavioral Law and Economics

• Goldin, J. 2015. Which Way To Nudge? Uncovering Preferences in the Behavioral Age, Yale Law Journal, 125(1): 226-270.

Consultation and Participation

• Kutay, A. 2015. Limits of Participatory Democracy in European Governance, European Law Review, 21(6): 803-818.
• Marxsen, C. 2015. Open Stakeholder Consultations at the European Level—Voice of the Citizens?, European Law Review, 21(2): 257-280.

Cost-Benefit Analysis

• Coates IV, J.C. 2015.Towards Better Cost-Benefit Analysis: An Essay on Regulatory Management, Law and Contemporary Problems, 78 (3): 1-23.
• Sinden, A. 2015. Formality and Informality in Cost-Benefit Analysis, Utah Law Review, 1: 93-172.
• Wansley, M. 2015. Cost-Benefit Analysis as a Commitment Device, Temple Law Review, 87(3): 447-500.

Disclosure

• Abazi, V. and E. Tauschinsky. 2015. Grounding the Public Need for Transparency in the European Union, Utrecht Law Review, 11(2): 78-90.

Judicial review

• Epstein, L. and M. Landes,  and W. Posner, 2015. Revisiting the Ideology Rankings of Supreme Court Justices, The Journal of Legal Studies, 44 (S1): S295–S317.
• Ghosh, D. S. 2015. “Inquiries That We Are Ill-Equipped To Judge”: Factfinding In Appellate Court Review Of Agency Rulemaking, New York University Law Review, 90(4):1269-1292.
• Herz, M. 2015. Chevron Is Dead; Long Live Chevron, Columbia Law Review, 115 (7): 1867-1910.
• Nou, J. 2015. Regulatory Textualism, Duke Law Journal, 65(1):81-150.
• Robert J. Jackson, R.J. Jr. 2015. Comment: Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Courts, Law and Contemporary Problems, 78 (3): 55-64.
• Wagner, W.E. 2015. A Place for Agency Expertise: Reconciling Agency Expertise with Presidential Power, Columbia Law Review, 115 (7): 2019-2070.

Regulatory agency

• Nou, J. 2015. Intra-Agency Coordination, Harvard Law Review, 129(2): 421-490.
• Barr, M.S. 2015. Comment: Accountability and Independence in Financial Regulation: Checks and Balances, Public Engagement, and Other Innovations, Law and Contemporary Problems, 78 (3): 119-128.
• Bubb, R. 2015. Comment: The OIRA Model for Institutionalizing CBA of Financial Regulation, Law and Contemporary Problems, 78 (3): 47-53.
• Friedrich, B. 2015. When the Regulators Refuse to Regulate: Pervasive USDA Underenforcement of the Humane Slaughter Act, Georgetown Law Journal, 104(1): 197-227.
• James D. Cox, J.D. 2015. Iterative Regulation of Securities Markets After Business Roundtable: A Principles-Based Approach, Law and Contemporary Problems, 78 (3): 25-45.
• Judge, K. 2015. The Federal Reserve: A Study in Soft Constraints, Law and Contemporary Problems, 78 (3): 65-96.
• Mendelson, N. A. 2015. The Uncertain Effects of Senate Confirmation Delays in the Agencies, Duke Law Journal, 64(8): 1571-1606.
• Merrill, W.T. 2015. A Comment on Metzger and Zaring: The Quicksilver Problem, Law and Contemporary Problems, 78 (3): 189-204.
• Metzger, E.G. 2015. Through the Looking Glass to a Shared Reflection: The Evolving Relation-ship Between Administrative Law and Financial Regulation, Law and Contemporary Problems, 78 (3): 129-156.
• Metzger, E.G. 2015. Agencies, Polarization, and the States, Columbia Law Review, 115 (7): 1739-1788.
• Peirce, H. 2014. Regulating through the Back Door at the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, Federalist Edition, 2(2): 321-393.
• Posner, E. A. 2015. How Do Bank Regulators Determine Capital-Adequacy Requirements?, University of Chicago Law Review, 82(4): 1853-1895.
• Scholten, M. 2015. Democratic Input Legitimacy of IRAs: Proposing an Assessment Framework, Utrecht Law Review, 11(2): 64-77.
• Schwarcz, S.L. 2015. Intrinsic Imbalance: The Impact of Income Disparity on Financial Regulation, Law and Contemporary Problems, 78 (3): 97-117.
• Sohoni, M. 2015. The Power to Privilege, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 163(2): 487-555.
• Zaring, D. 2015. Law and Custom on the Federal Open Market Committee, Law and Contemporary Problems, 78 (3): 157-188.

Regulatory Cooperation

• Ahdieh, R.B. 2015. Coordination and Conflict: The Persistent Relevance of Networks in International Financial Regulation, Law and Contemporary Problems, 78 (4): 75-101.
• Bignami, F. and G. Resta. 2015. Transatlantic Privacy Regulation: Conflict and Cooperation, Law and Contemporary Problems, 78 (4): 231-266.
• Bull, R.T. 2015. Developing a Domestic Framework for International Regulatory Cooperation, Law and Contemporary Problems, 78 (4): 49-74.
• Bull, R.T., Mahboubi, N.A., Stewart, R.B and J.B. Wiener. 2015. New Approaches to International Regulatory Cooperation: The Challenge of TTIP, TPP, and Mega-Regional Trade Agreements, Law and Contemporary Problems, 78 (4): 1-29.
• Dunoff, J.L. 2015. Mapping a Hidden World of International Regulatory Cooperation, Law and Contemporary Problems, 78 (4): 267-299.
• Gray, C.B. 2015. Upgrading Existing Regulatory Mechanisms for Transatlantic Regulatory Cooperation, Law and Contemporary Problems, 78 (4): 31-48.
• Howse, R. 2015. Regulatory Cooperation, Regional Trade Agreements, and World Trade Law: Conflict or Complementarity?, Law and Contemporary Problems, 78 (4): 137-151.
• Meuwese, A. 2015. Constitutional Aspects of Regulatory Coherence in TTIP: An EU Perspective, Law and Contemporary Problems, 78 (4): 153-174.
• Mota Prado, M. and V. Bertrand. 2015. Regulatory Cooperation in Latin America: The Case of Mercosur, Law and Contemporary Problems, 78 (4): 205-230.
• Nicola, F.G. 2015. The Politicization of Legal Expertise in the TTIP Negotiation, Law and Contemporary Problems, 78 (4): 175-204.
• White, T. 2015. From the Group of Twenty to the Group of Two: The Need for Harmonizing Derivatives Regulation Between the United States and the European Union, Law and Contemporary Problems, 78 (4): 301-333.
• Wiener, J.B. and A. Alemanno. 2015. The Future of International Regulatory Cooperation: TTIP as a Learning Process Toward a Global Policy Laboratory, Law and Contemporary Problems, 78 (4): 103-136.

Regulatory Governance

• Adam, M. S. 2015. Death and Paperwork Reduction, Duke Law Journal, 65(2): 279-344.
• Arlen, J. and S. Tontrup, 2015. Does the Endowment Effect Justify Legal Intervention? The Debiasing Effect of Institutions, The Journal of Legal Studies, 44 (1): 143–182.
• Bartl, M. 2015. Internal Market Rationality, Private Law and the Direction of the Union: Resuscitating the Market as the Object of the Political, European Law Journal, 21 (5): 572-598.
• Bia, Y. 2015. Experimentalist approach of Chinese legislation model: From passive response to institutional design, The Theory and Practice of Legislation, 3(2): 141-167.
• Brummer, C. 2015. Disruptive Technology and Securities Regulation, Fordham Law Review, 84(3): 577-1052.
• Dorn, N. 2015. Legal ‘Elasticity’ and ‘Sidestepping’ in European Crisis Management of Financial Markets, European Law Journal, 21 (6): 787–802.
• Dudley, S.E. 2015. Improving Regulatory Accountability: Lessons from the Past and Prospects for the Future, Case Western Reserve Law Review, 65(4): 1027- 1057.
• Fischer, D. 2015. Dodd–Frank’s Failure to Address CFTC Oversight of Self-Regulatory Organization Rulemaking,  Columbia Law Review, 115(1): 69-126.
• Gluck, A.R., O’ Connell, A.J. and R. Po. 2015. Unorthodox Lawmaking, Unorthodox Rulemaking,  Columbia Law Review, 115 (7): 1789-1866.
• Green, H. 2015. Muzzling Antitrust: Information Products, Innovation and Free Speech, Boston University Law Review, 95(1):35-107.
• Hahn, R.W and R.A. Ritz, 2015. Does the Social Cost of Carbon Matter? Evidence from US Policy, The Journal of Legal Studies, 44 (1): 229–248.
• Heldeweg, A.M. 2015. Experimental legislation concerning technological & governance innovation – an analytical approach, The Theory and Practice of Legislation, 3(2): 169-193.
• Johnston, A. 2015. Regulating Hedge Funds for Systemic Stability: The EU’s Approach, European Law Journal, 21 (6): 758–786.
• Lin, T. C.W. 2015. Reasonable Investor(s), Boston University Law Review, 95(2): 461-518.
• Marneffe, W. 2015. Time is money: the cost of waiting for the government,The Theory and Practice of Legislation, 3(2): 213-229.
• Masur, J. S. and E. A. Posner, 2015. Toward a Pigouvian State, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 164(1): 93-147.
• Minzner, M. 2015. Should Agencies Enforce?, Minnesota Law Review, 99(6): 2113-2173.
• Ranchordás, S. 2015. Time, Timing, And Experimental Legislation, The Theory and Practice of Legislation, 3(2): 135-139.
• Rao, N. 2015. Administrative Collusion: How Delegation Diminishes the Collective Congress, New York University Law Review, 90(5): 1463-1526.
• Van Loo, R. 2015. Helping Buyers Beware: The Need for Supervision of Big Retail, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 163(5): 1311-1392.
• Weimer, M. 2015. Risk Regulation and Deliberation in EU Administrative Governance—GMO Regulation and Its Reform, European Law Journal, 21 (5): 622–640.